Microsoft BPOS Limitations – Be Careful.

SharePoint » SharePoint Hosting » Microsoft BPOS Limitations – Be Careful.

Daily, we get customers who are learning the hard way that Microsoft’s Online Services BPOS (business productivity online service) does have significant limitations when it comes to SharePoint. To save you time, they are listed below. Go ahead and skip to the bottom if you like, you won’t hurt my feelings. I would also like to qualify this post by saying that BPOS is a solid offering for a small startup that also needs Exchange hosting and Live Meeting. For a couple of users, it is a good value, however, for more than a few users with growing storage needs, maybe not; crunch the numbers and decide for yourself.

Another interesting note is that Microsoft is encouraging to put forth a BPOS offering of our own incorporating fully functional SharePoint (WSS v3). I think you will see a fully functional SharePoint Hosting / BPOS on steroids offering in Q3 from the friendly folks at

So, before you get too far down the road, pause and add this list to your due diligence.
WARNING – failure to read and think through the following may cost you and your team hundreds of man-hours and lots of moola.

Features NOT Available in Microsoft BPOS:

  1. Anonymous users supported
  2. UI enhancements
  3. Server control
  4. Customization / Code Deployment
  5. 3rd party web parts installation
  6. Unlimited user account creation with no additional fees
  7. Daily site backups
  8. Custom domain names supported
  9. Dedicated solution for any number of users

And yes, if you’ve just finished reading that list – those are all features that are supported by WSS v3, MOSS 2007 and SharePoint Server 2010 from SharePoint Hosting Provider

2009-06-17T13:16:10+00:00 June 17th, 2009|


  1. dibyendu dawn February 21, 2012 at 5:17 am - Reply

    For your information, as of date 22 feb, 2012.. all the limitation you have mentioned… have fully supported by BPOS-D enviornment.. even BCS also supporting now.

  2. Marc Anderson June 19, 2009 at 12:52 pm - Reply

    When do you mean by Q3 for BPOS on steroids? (Not sure of your fiscal calendar.) As someone who is already using your hosted Exchange and WSS, we would love to hear more!


  3. Jackson Wilson May 27, 2010 at 8:50 am - Reply

    Have your opinions of BPOS changed over the last 12 months?

    Are your noted shortcomings in the BPOS offering still gaps or do you believe Microsoft has addressed them?

    Thank you – Jackson

  4. Staff June 3, 2010 at 6:34 pm - Reply

    @Jackson Wilson

    BPOS will continue to evolve and there are even rumors that some server access will be allowed in future releases. However, with both BPOS and BPOS-D, you are limited by the number of users you have. You can only have so many for BPOS, and you have to have an EXTRAORDINARY number to even qualify for BPOS-D. Even with server access – Microsoft will never support the level of free, unrestricted customizations that we do. will continue to serve our customer base – comprised of everyone else, needing flexible SharePoint hosting that’s “just right” for them. No matter the users, the storage, or the customizations our clients need – we fit the bill. We also continue to provide personalized customer service to our customers who we know by name – not by number. That is something that a company the size of Microsoft will never be able to provide.

    It is important to point out that we work very closely with Microsoft – including the BPOS team to ensure that every company who needs SharePoint – has a solution that works for them. We are happy to be the provider that Microsoft recommends to those who need customized, flexible SharePoint Hosting solutions.

    Thanks for reading.

  5. Thomas Derenthal August 11, 2010 at 12:57 pm - Reply

    HELP! I don’t know where else to go. I recently closed a new client and am getting them set up on BPOS. Exchange gives 25GB per seat. But Sharepoint… 1.25 GB for five seats?! that’s 250MB/seat. This is 2010, storage is not measured MB. To purchase 100GB of additional storage is $250/per month. Deal killer! I can get a $6/month hosting account at with 150GB.

    What am I missing here? 1.25 GB is useless for Sharepoint. Why 25GB per mail box and such a uselessly small amount for Sharepoint?

    No, seriously, I have to go back to the client an tell them that their licenses will cost $50/month, but storage is $250/month. Then the laughing begins. Then I lose the client. MS, what ARE you thinking?

  6. Sven September 28, 2010 at 11:13 am - Reply

    Does any one knows a good solution that will automatically upload PST files onto hosted Exchange (or BPOS for this matter)?

    I know Datamills EdgeSafe have a beta for a soultion that will migrate PSTs directly from workstations into mailboxes (per central configuration), and I wonder if there are other solutions you know of?

  7. Everett September 30, 2010 at 10:56 am - Reply


    What we did was to import the PST file after the mailbox was created in BPOS. This worked very well with the exception of the largest mailboxes which ended up being only 2 users.

    Hope this helps.

  8. Brian September 30, 2010 at 3:59 pm - Reply

    Does anyone know the cost difference from BPOS-S to BPOS-D? I would imagine that volume licensing would incur some cost savings?

  9. Rob September 30, 2010 at 4:09 pm - Reply

    Hey Brian,

    BPOS-D starts at 5,000 seats and they do offer some discounting once you get into this sort of volume.

    Let me know what you need ( and if can’t help you, I will put you in touch with the Microsoft BPOS-D team.


  10. Mr. WorkedThere October 13, 2010 at 12:27 am - Reply

    You are sooooooo right on. These are things they really don’t want you to think about. I had the honor of being witness to seeing how these issues (and customers) are being dealt with while they continue to construct and sell this juggernaut they can barely control. There are many terrifying truths that won’t be mentioned to you when you sign up. Exempli gratia: How the Exchange teams don’t know a thing about Active Directory (nor do they care) and likewise how the many heads of this hydra don’t communicate with each other before acting.
    I remember the old days when any bugs in the software were immediately assigned to developers for a hotfix. Of course, that was when only one or two customers experienced the problem & when it turned out to be a bug. Any administrator will tell you that applying a hotfix always implies an element of risk to the topology. So, imagine if applying a hotfix threatened to blow away your house of cards. (i.e. BPOS – all of it.) Probably not a risk Microsoft is willing to take. So whether big or small, don’t believe that your bug will be fixed in short order, no matter how critical. However it will, I’m sure, be added to the list of issues to be dealt with in the next “revision”.

  11. Jason January 28, 2011 at 3:23 pm - Reply

    Service Descriptions:

    BPOS servers are backed up every 12 hours with backup datacenters.

    There is a dedicated version of BPOS called BPOS-D, the “D” stands for dedicated. BPOS-S is the standard version. With BPOS-D you get access to Central Administration.

  12. […] 365 will meet the needs of millions of users worldwide, but it’s important to realize that the limitations of BPOS – especially in the realm of SharePoint – create a place where Office 365 stops and […]

  13. […] everyone! The last time I popped up on your radar, I mentioned serious SharePoint limitations in Microsoft BPOS (Microsoft SharePoint Online). To clarify, I don’t mean to sound as though I know exactly […]

  14. Finding good SharePoint hosting services - questions to ask May 20, 2014 at 10:13 am - Reply

    […] if your fully functional hosted SharePoint environment is the same as it would be on-premise.  A watered-down version of SharePoint may not migrate, leaving you in a tricky bind.  Competent providers should be able to provide and […]

  15. Office365: Good for SMB, Bad for Partners May 21, 2014 at 11:02 am - Reply

    […] like Microsoft still isn’t listening to its partners.  Just like the old BPOS, MS still wants to own the customer and bill them directly (possibly eliminating the partner) for […]

Leave A Comment